15 August 2013
The internet has been on fire about this “Disarmament Commission – Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group” document that has been floating around social media sites. There have been many reporters “claiming” this document is a fraud. I would like to dig a little deeper to see if they are possibly spreading disinformation in order to calm down the American people, or are they telling the truth?
According to Politifact:
The document is persuasive enough to have been picked up by pro-gun advocates on a few message boards and Facebook pages. But is it real?
When we checked with the United Nations, a spokesman declared it a fake.
“I checked the document number on our internal document system, and the reply I got back now was simply, ‘There is no document matching your request,’ said Farhan Haq, associate spokesperson for the Secretary-General. “The document number (A/CN.11/L.72) doesn’t conform to our standard system, in any case.”
In addition, Haq said, “there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in confiscating weapons from member states.”
Finally, Haq said, “the use of blue ink, some of the type font and the scanner icon in the bottom right-hand corner are not found in real U.N. documents. So, in several different ways, this document is fake.”
A document found on the Internet and circulating via email and social media says that a United Nations working group has “adopted a proposed agenda” to enable member nations to “disarm civilians within their borders.” If the document were real, it would confirm the worst fears of those who fear a mass confiscation of handguns, hunting rifles and ammunition in the U.S. — but a United Nations spokesman cited several reasons for concluding that the document is a fake, including the fact that the study group referenced in the document does not exist. We rate the document Pants on Fire.
I would like to point out that according to the PolitiFact article:” Farhan Hag, associate spokesperson for the Secretary-General, said “The document number (A/CN.11/L.72) doesn’t conform to our standard system, in any case”.
But is this true? First we need to ask some very important questions.
- Is there a motive to lie?
- Are these statements posted on Politifact factual?
- Have these reporters been known for disinformation campaign’s before?
- What purpose could be obtained by covering up and spreading disinformation?
- Does UNODA have a history of “disarming citizens” in other countries? Are there ties to New York City?
- Finally, is this document real?
Yes, there is a motive to lie. By denying this UNODA “restricted” document, it buys the corrupt officials within our government and the United Nations more time for “damage control.” It is no secret that the United Nations has intentions to “disarm” the American people, nor is it a surprise that our government and Mainstream Media (paid off pundits) are covering up the fact our government is still working with the United Nations to implement UN Agenda 21 within the United States. Our government knows if they do not use “damage control” that the American people will stand together, we will not tolerate this, and all their plans will be ruined.
The Obama administration has been forcing UN Agenda 21 through the EPA “rules and guidelines” for years. We have also seen that ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability (formerly known as International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives – the name has been changed to disguise what they are really doing) is the group used to manipulate “sustainable development” within local communities working their way around the nation. The “Disarmament Commission – Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group” simply confirms in black and white what have been reporting on and fighting against for years. Patriots within local communities have been fighting against the implementation of UN Agenda 21 for years. Congress voted against the implementation of UN Agenda 21 years ago, after seeing the “Wildlands Project Map”. The Obama administration pushes illegal “rules” via Executive Order bypassing congress, implementing UN Agenda 21, while establishing a globalist “genocidal” plan.
Have these reporters been known for disinformation campaigns before? Yes, actually they have been caught in many disinformation campaigns. I am surprised that anyone still finds them credible. I have previously “debunked” propaganda that Politifact and The Washington Post put out to discredit Senator Rand Paul’s truthful statements about the danger of the UN Small Arms Trade Treaty. See other examples: here and here. PolitiFact strongly supports Obama, leftist ideas, and lies on many occasions to cover for a political agenda. Does it surprise anyone that once again Politifact is pushing a “Media Psyop” in order to protect this administration’s ultimate agenda?
In the search for truth I will pick apart quotes to see if it actually lines up with what is being said by the document. First, let us see if there are any document numbers, or comparisons that can be made through other UNODA documents that would confirm and show these numbers are consistent with numbers used by the UNODA “Disarmament Commission.” United Nations General Assembly Disarmament Commission Substantive Session in New York, April 1-19 2013. This document is numbered (A/CN.10/L.70). If you scroll down to the bottom of this document you can see the bar code numbers as well. Which amazingly, surprise the bar-codes match the (A/CN.11/L.72) “Disarmament Commission – Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group” bar code. Bar Code number is “12-53542 (E) 091012″. Thus showing that these numbers are used, and also coincide with UNODA and United Nations actual documents. Other examples of comparable numbers can be found here.
Does UNODA have a history of “disarming citizens” in other countries? Are there ties to New York City? The answer is yes on both counts. Take a lookhere. You will also find another branch out of UNODA is called “UNLIREC” which has also been used to disarm citizens around the world in the name of “safety”. The Official Website will show you they not only confiscate small weapons but destroy these small arms as well.
In conclusion there is enough evidence to suggest this document is the real deal. It is my strong opinion this document should be investigated by the congressional oversight committee. If this document is legitimate and we fail to act upon it, then we have allowed our country to be destroyed because we choose to believe known “propaganda” news agencies. If it is not legitimate then at least we did our duty of due diligence.
While I can not confirm 100% percent that this is an original document. If we do not require an investigation into this document, and it is legitimate, we have allowed ourselves to be complicit with the destruction of America as well as humanity. It is our duty and responsibility to demand a serious investigation to get to the truth.
Click here to contact your representatives and request they look into this document.
Editor’s Note: As Lorri points out, there is much in the document that can be compared to the UN’s history of weapons confiscation across the globe. She does leave the possibility open that the document could be fraudulent. With that in mind, I had a friend, who works with imaging software and the creation of videos. It is his opinion that the document is forged, due to various anomalies in the document image. In either case, judge for yourselves whether or not the UN has worked this way in the past and whether or not other news sources have been complicit in covering up the truth.