21 July 2013
By Dave Hodges
According the Attorney General Holder, “The Drone Ranger”
can kill anyone, at any time and anywhere.
In March 2013, Attorney General, Eric Holder, answered a February 2013 inquiry from Senator Rand Paul as to whether Obama had any intentions of assassinating American citizens on American soil through the use of drones.Holder also stated that Obama “has no intention” of targeting American citizens with unmanned aerial vehicles, but would do so if facing “an extraordinary circumstance.”
I presume from the Attorney General’s characterization of Obama’s need to assassinate America citizens, but only under “an extraordinary circumstance” applies to journalists attempting to the tell the truth about the morally bankrupt Obama administration and their criminal enterprise operations which constitute a clear and present danger to the United States.
This is the first of a two part story which examines the three following questions:
1. Was Michael Hastings murdered?
2. If so, why was he murdered?
3. How was the murder accomplished?
Part one of this series examines the evidence supporting a charge of murder in the death investigative reporter Michael Hastings. Also, some the ground work is laid with regard to the second question on why Michael Hasting was murdered? Part two will fully develop the motives as to why Hastings was murdered as well as how the murder was accomplished. The cover story related to Hastings’ death will be examined as well as evidence which destroys the credibility of the “official account.” Also Part two will reveal, just as we witnessed in the JFK assassination, the lives of the investigators looking into this event are also in jeopardy.
Obama and Holder Are Cut From the Same Cloth As the Zeta’s
The Zeta’s Mexican drug cartel gang is known for abducting their opposition, torturing and murdering them and then dissolving their bodies in acid in order to destroy the evidence of the crime. As the news of these heinous crimes reached the US air waves, the media impact of these stories created a collective sense of horror among the public. However, most of the mainstream media’s reaction to these abhorrent acts seems to be selective at best. It seems acceptable to reveal these types of crimes when it involves Mexican national gangsters, but if the same acts are approved of by the highest ranking officials in our country, the coverage of the topic is out of bounds. However, an emerging story related to the murder of journalist Michael Hastings is casting Obama and Holder in the same light as the well-publicized Zeta Mexican drug cartel and their barbaric and murderous ways.
Today, the NSA/CIA and even the President can “legally” kill a whistleblower, force local officials to conduct a shoddy autopsy and then cremate the body of the victim, against the wishes of the next of kin, and then send the ashes to the grieving relatives in an urn just as the coroner did with the body of Michael Hastings. Subsequently, the evidence is destroyed and Obama and Holder maintain plausible deniability. The murder of Michael Hastings is proof positive that we are indeed being ruled by the most virulent criminals on the planet and the evidence that follows supports this allegation.
The Official Version of Hastings Death
Michael Hastings Body Was Cremated Against Family Wishes
The official version of the Hastings death stated that he was traveling at an excessive speed, at least 80 mph, when he lost control of his car and he crashed into a tree causing his Mercedes to burst into a flames, which resulted in his death. According to the coroner, the Hastings body was burned beyond recognition. That claim is disputed by an eyewitness to the crime as reported on Infowars Nightly News who stated that the body was recognizable and intact..
The fact Hastings’ family had requested that the body be sent to them for proper burial and this request was not honored, should be investigated. Unless there was a compelling legal reason to not comply with the family request to have the body sent to them, the coroner committed a criminal act for which he should be prosecuted.
The Cover Up Commences
All the signs point to a murder to prevent Hastings from releasing some very important and damning information regarding a coming false flag attack by the present administration. All murders have a motive and you just read the motive for killing Michael Hastings and the following is a progressive account which leads up to that conclusion.
Just a few hours before his death, Hastings sent an email to colleagues at Buzzfeed.com stating that he was “onto a big story” and that he would have “to go off the radar for a bit.” Hastings use of the word, “radar” is both ironic and compelling as the readers will soon learn why this is true in Part two. Interestingly, Hastings also told Buzzfeed.com that that they might be questioned about him by authorities. If you think this is starting to sound a lot like the Edwin Snowden affair, you are correct and that connection between Snowden and Hastings will be explored as well in Part Two. .
A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: Hastings Was Murdered
Michael Hastings was the ultimate reporter and a consummate whistle-blower. For example, Michael Hastings brought down the command of General McChrystal the senior commander in Afghanistan in which his insubordination and lack of respect for Obama was reported in Rolling Stone Magazine by Hastings.
Hastings has served as a one man wrecking crew regarding the exposing the governmental lies connected to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is rumored to have had a behind-the-scenes hand in Snowden’s revelations about the NSA.
We know now, from Twitter, and various spokespeople from Wikileaks, that Hastings had contacted Wikileaks and said he was being investigated by the FBI. The following tweet is the first element in the notion that Hastings was murdered to cover up his potential release of volatile information resulting in the fall of the Obama empire.
Murder WikiLeaks ✔@wikileaks
Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him.
Yet, the FBI claims that they were not investigating Hastings death. That was a true statement by the FBI at the time it was made, because dead men tell no tales.Thus, an investigation would no longer be necessary.
control of his speeding car which crashed into a tree and the car subsequently burst into flames. I have looked at the video and still pictures of the crime scene and I have a very hard time believing the official story as a result. My heartfelt thanks goes out to Jim Stone and LoudLabs for publishing these crash scene pictures. Look at Hastings car, as it is fully engulfed in flames from an alleged head-on, high speed crash into a tree. Please notice the silhouette of the burning car, that the front end of the care is fully intact. The significance of this will become apparent in the following paragraphs.
Now, look at the adjacent picture of the tree taken following the accident. Does this tree look like it was target of a high speed crash in which some say that Hastings would have been going in excess of 80 mph at the time of impact? The tree isn’t even bent! This is an ill conceived crime scene explanation which rivals the unbelievable “magic bullet” theory which was brought forth in the JFK assassination to explain how one bullet could strike two men and create five different wounds.
There there is the issue of the front end of the car. The above picture proves that the front end of the car struck nothing. However, the rear end of the car is damaged and appears to have been blown out. Unless Hastings was driving in reverse, it did not strike any tree. And since the tree was not struck by Hastings car, other outside explanations must be now be considered.
Even more telling in this murder mystery is the fact that even the officials cannot even keep their cover stories straight.
A Westside LA newspaper, The Park Labrea News/ Beverly Press stated that “LAPD investigators have stated foul play was involved.” Yet when the newspaper attempted to question the lead investigator in the case, Detective Connie White from the LAPD’s West Traffic Division, regarding the investigators revelation of foul play, she did not return calls to the newspaper, thus, refusing comment on the status of the investigation.
This is a significant revelation because we have to remember that when whistleblower Andrew Breitbart was murdered, so was his coroner following the autopsy. The coroner who had investigated the Breitbart death was poisoned to death. Therefore, isn’t it logical to assume that the LA coroner and LAPD Detective White are aware of this fact and are subsequently afraid of their own shadow? The fix is in and official statements other than the “approved” version will not be forthcoming.
In a related story, it was revealed in May that the Justice Department secretly obtained phone records of journalists at the Associated Press. Did this Fourth Amendment violation of journalist records stop with the AP reporters? Were Hastings records subject to illegal scrutiny as well? It would be hard to imagine a scenario where this was not the case. Keep in mind, Hastings was dead less than 30 days following this revelation. This is where a future Grand Jury investigation needs to begin into the murder of Michael Hastings.
If this were a Grand Jury Inquest, the purveyors of this head on collision with a tree fantasy would have an impossible burden to overcome the evidence that has been presented here. Indictments would be issued and heads in Washington DC would begin to roll.
Michael Hastings was a talented and courageous journalist. He left behind friends and family that loved him. He deserves to have the motives and the method used to murder him exposed. These items will be the topic of Part Two.